There's also enough people tracking things that if it was busted in general it would probably be widely reported but even if not you can't really expect that Inno is going to prove to various people posting here that their RNG is working? That's way too much work and entirely pointless as the vast majority of the people that I've seen posting here display that they don't know very much about RNG (not that I know much either but my statistic classes are still dimly accessible in my head ). But there's the point of asking for data sets to back up the claim that your or any individual's particular GB is busted. Can an individual GB be messed up? Maybe. There's plenty of people that play this game and enough of them post here that track these items to show that in general Inno's randomness is fine. What you really mean is you agree with him and want Inno to prove that they aren't messing it up. Contrary to what many people may think, there are actual repeatable outcomes (not sure the terminology is right here but the point still remains) in random events and this have been proven mathematically already. Since they provided no facts it's not an 'open mind' at question here. An open mind requires you to actually consider the actual facts of the matter.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |